WebNov 11, 2024 · In this section, we present two theories about the justification of evidentiary judgments in criminal law in which coherence plays a central role (Sections 2.1 and 2.2) and offer a few suggestions about how they can be combined and improved (Section 2.3). The first theory we expound is the scenario theory of Van Koppen (2011, 2024). WebIt has been suggested that the place of such arguments depends on a postulated requirement of ‘coherence’ in the law; ‘coherence’ in the sense that the multitudinous rules of a developed legal system should ‘make sense’ when taken together. It has also been proposed that it is a limiting requirement of legal justification that ...
Legal Justification by Optimal Coherence - PhilPapers
WebCoherence in reasoning is one important test of its soundness as reasoning. It is a test which is not fully satisfied by mere consistency, in the sense of an absence of self … WebConsidered as a property of a legal object, legal coherence must lie somewhere between the minimal requirements of hypothetical justification and the maximal requirements of … caretakers and cleaners collective agreement
4 - The coherence theory of justification - Cambridge Core
WebThe main tenet of coherentism—and what makes it a distinctive theory of justification—is the claim that coherence generates justification. There are different … Web40 minutes ago · Covington & Burling is to advise a Ukrainian billionaire on his arbitration against Russia for seized assets in the Donetsk and Luhansk regions. SCM … WebCoherentism in Epistemology. Coherentism is a theory of epistemic justification. It implies that for a belief to be justified it must belong to a coherent system of beliefs. For a system of beliefs to be coherent, the beliefs that make up that system must “cohere” with one another. Typically, this coherence is taken to involve three ... caretakers anonymous